?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Hmm. They're still not getting it, are they?
passion
bohemiancoast
Dear LiveJournal user bohemiancoast,

We have received a report that your default userpic, located at http://www.livejournal.com/userpic/46958643/536672, is presently in violation of LiveJournal's policies regarding default user picture icons. Our policies on the content restrictions on default userpics are described at http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=111. In particular, images of the female breast that depict the nipple or areola regions are inappropriate for use as a default userpic.

We must stress that the image itself is not a violation of this policy, simply the use of it as a default userpic, as default userpics are visible in many public areas throughout the site. You're welcome to continue using the userpic as a non-default icon. However, we must ask that you change your default userpic to something that does meet these guidelines, or select no default userpic at all.

We ask that you make these changes as soon as possible. Unfortunately, if the changes are not made by 00:01 on June 14, 2006, we will need to take temporary action to remove your account from public view until you can make these changes.

Regards,
Justin

  • 1
Tell them it's a man-boob in the picture.

Some of the legal icons showing man-boobs are really horrid, in fact.

I am pretty sure it's not a breast at all in my photo. The pics come from the Avent site, and I am fairly sure that the 'breastfeeding' one is photoshopped from the bottle feeding one.

I am wondering how stylised the representation of the nipple has to be before it's ok. They sent a suspension notice on the Klimt. Would a pic of three concentric circles fail? Only if the colour choice was wrong? What about the 'Love Is' children? I might iconise


  • 1